X-Message-Number: 13109 From: (JOHN KRUG) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 13:04:08 -0800 (PST) Subject: Non EMS Cryonics Hi: Re: #13104. My opinion hasn't changed. The tone of the suggestions contained in #13086 can be construed as the arbitrary and compulsory use of perfected cryostasis against certain groups of people who may have characteristics that are "undesirable" to the author. Who's to make such judgments? Seeking "final solutions" has already been done. I think such lines of thinking are destructive and should be avoided in order that positive growth of perfected cryostasis as an option can be realized. Best Regards! John B. Krug Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=13109