X-Message-Number: 1519
From: 
Subject: CRYONICS LEF civil case
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 92 01:10:55 PST

Appologies for posting this, but my unease with respect to recent
postings is hard to fathom without some background.  Keith
-----
Mail-order vitamin companies wage trade war

Broward, Nevada firms fight FDA and each other

by Lisa Gibbs, Review Staff

[From the Broward Review, Friday, December 4, 1992
reproduced without permission (yet)--for private use only]

  The month before they were charged with importing 
unapproved drugs, Saul Kent and William Faloon brought a 
series of full-page newspaper ads in South Florida 
trumpeting their Hollywood company's battle with the U.S. 
Food and Drug Administration over its crackdown on 
distributors of nutritional supplements.  "The FDA is a 
criminal agency," the ads declared.  "The Life Extension 
Foundation is fighting back." 

  Positioning themselves as martyrs fighting big 
government over health-care freedom has been a key element 
of Kent's and Faloon's defense against a November, 1991 
Federal indictment.  They are accused of setting up an 
international network of shell companies to sell 
unapproved drugs in the United States. 

  Kent and Faloon, whose Life Extension Foundation raises 
money for anti-aging research and who sell vitamin 
products through an affiliate, have challenged a variety 
of FDA policies in court.  They claim the FDA is 
prosecuting them because they are vocal critics of the 
agency.  They deny involvement in the import business and 
say the FDA has misbranded vitamins as drugs. 

  That argument wins support from colleagues who question 
the wisdom of the FDA's increasingly aggressive regulatory 
posture toward vitamins.  The strategy also has paid off 
with the public; membership in the Life Extension 
Foundation has doubled since it publicized its troubles 
with the FDA. 

  But beneath those trendy issues cloaking Kent and 
Faloon's plight is another struggle that's decidedly more 
capitalistic.  That battle is over money, specifically a 
fight for market share in a closely knit subculture of 
those who believe heavy doses of vitamins can prolong 
life. 
    
 The struggle is between the two major competitors who 
specialize in mixing mega-dose vitamin cocktails and 
selling them by direct mail, the Life Extension 
Foundation, and the Carson City, Nev.-based Vitamin 
Research Products Inc. 

  Kent and Faloon say VRP executives caused the FDA to 
indict them as part of a scheme to put them out of 
business. 

  The FDA defends itself and its aggressive stance against 
so-called longevity products, saying in one report, "These 
are fraudulent and potentially dangerous products.  When 
we learn of substantial commercial sources of these 
products, we will take legal actions against the promoters 
and their products." 

 ** Dominating a niche ** 

  Life Extension and VRP may be small players in the 
billion-dollar mainstream vitamin industry, but they're 
the biggest in their niche.  According to their own 
estimates they gross $6 million a year between them, 
competing for the business of a core group of about 100,000 
enthusiasts. 

  "The [longevity] market is growing dramatically," says 
Steven W. Fowkes, who follows the industry as head of the 
California groups MegaHealth Society and Cognitive 
Enhancement Research Institute.  "If the FDA pulled out of 
the picture, it would grow twice as fast as it is now 
because people will be able to talk about the benefits of 
supplements." 

  Fowkes says Life Extension, VRP, and other mail-order 
companies have the most to gain from market growth because 
their manufacturing and distribution systems can get 
products to consumers much faster than retailers.  In this 
business, faster means fresher. 

  In the past five years, the Foundation's gross revenues 
from product sales and membership have increased from $1.7 
million in 1986 to an estimated $4 million. 

  When VRP open in 1980, it was the first to specialize in 
mail order longevity products.  Kent, a supporter of 
cryonics who gained notoriety in 1987 when he froze his 
mother's head, founded the Life Extension Foundation a 
year later and began selling products in 1983.  Kent is 
president of the company and Faloon is vice president. 

  VRP and Life Extension feuded from the start. 

  VRP executives say Faloon sent forged letters from the 
American Aging Association and the Federal Trade 
Commission asking for mailing list and other confidential 
documents so Life Extension could steal VRP customers.  
Faloon says VRP conspired with a fired Life Extension 
employee to get him and Kent indicted.  The two companies 
have been trading suits since 1987. 

  In the latest salvos, Life Extension sued VRP's chief 
executive Robert Watson for libel in Broward Circuit Court 
after he mailed letters to customers questioning the 
quality of Life Extension products. 

  In September, VRP sued Life Extension and Faloon for 
extortion, libel, and interference with business 
relationships.  Faloon, the suit says, threatened to mail 
damaging letters to VRP customers unless VRP paid $5,000 a 
month into a Life Extension research fund.  VRP refused to 
pay, and Faloon mailed out letters bearing the heading, 
"VRP exposed as an FDA informant." 

  Faloon also mailed letters to VRP's creditors -- VRP is 
reorganizing in California bankruptcy court under new 
owners -- stating that "VRP is on the verge of total 
disintegration" and proposing to take over and "save" VRP.  
"We were just bringing out the truth," Faloon said in an 
interview. 

  "I'm appalled at how these people do business," said 
Watson, who took over VRP 18 months ago.  "They're not 
your normal business people.  This childish name-calling 
or rock-throwing just doesn't happen in other companies." 

** A big file ** 

Kent and Faloon say that VRP's desire for a monopoly 
landed them in federal court.  An ex-VRP employee 
testified for Faloon and Kent that a former VRP president 
bragged in 1986 that he had turned over to the FDA a thick 
file of information to "destroy the Life Extension 
Foundation."  The ex-president allegedly compiled the file 
with the help of a fired Life Extension employee, Dave 
Shelhamer, who Faloon says also sold his mailing list to 
competitors. 

  Watson said he wasn't around then and doesn't know the 
details, but Fowkes, who followed the events and reported 
on them in industry newsletters, said Kent and Faloon's 
story is true -- almost. 

  When VRP executives turned over a file to the FTC and 
the FDA, Fowkes said, they didn't know that the source was 
Life Extension. 

  Faloon and Kent in 1984 begun "a campaign to harm 
[VRP]," according to a 1987 suit filed in Broward Circuit 
Court.  This included: sending two change of address 
forms to the Post Office so they would receive VRP's mail; 
forging the letter from the American Aging Association; 
and setting up a company called Vitamin Factory, which 
sent letters denigrating VRP's products. 

  Faloon said those letters were sent by disgruntled VRP 
employees, and that he believes VRP executives knew exactly 
what they were doing when they turned the file over to 
regulators.  "Nobody believes it, but it's all true," 
Faloon said.  "It's not unheard-of for competitors in 
businesses regulated by the FDA to run to the FDA to do 
their dirty work for them. 

** Alias allegation ** 

  VRP also accused Faloon of orchestrating a phoney 
buy-out attempt of VRP using the alias John Steinmark and 
a fake Swiss company to get confidential information.  
Company investigations exposed the connection between 
Steinmark and Life Extension, Fowkes said. 

  According to the indictment, Faloon used the Steinmark 
alias to set up the Hauptmann Institute in Vienna.  The 
Institute, which the FDA says sold and delivered 
unapproved drugs to the United States, was nothing more 
than a mail drop. 

  Kent and Faloon created promotional literature for the 
Hauptmann Institute, the indictment says, using a model 
with a lab coat and a stethoscope to create photographs of 
"Dr. Karl Gustav-Hauptmann."  the literature claimed that 
certain drugs could be used to treat or prevent disease 
including AIDS, cancer, heart disease and Alzheimer's. 

  The unapproved drugs included Gerovital H3, which
extensionists claim helps senility and heart disease.  
GH3's active ingredient is procaine hydrochloride, an 
anesthetic. 

  Kent and Faloon allegedly routed the drugs through 
England to Miami.  They routed the money from the mail drop 
in Austria to two mail boxes in Hollywood rented in 
Steinmark's name. 

  Faloon denies that Steinmark is his alias and says Life 
Extension's involvement is the creation of VRP and a 
disgruntled former Life Extension employees.  Faloon says 
he worked with Steinmark when Steinmark was the managing 
partner for the Vitamin Factory, and that explains why the 
FDA found his fingerprints on correspondence mailed by 
Steinmark. 

  "And he was apparently doing some work with the 
Hauptmann Institute," Faloon said.  "I never looked at his 
identification.  As far as I know he exists.  He's not 
around, we are, and so we're easy targets for the FDA. 

  The indictment of Kent and Faloon is one of two such 
criminal cases in the country, said FDA spokesman Michael 
Schaffer. 

  The warfare between the two companies has others in the 
industry feeling more than a bit awkward.  While they 
disapprove of Kent's and Faloon's tactics, they disapprove 
of the FDA even more. 

  "I've been following this with mixed feelings," said 
Ward Dean, a physician, author and editor for *Experimental 
Gerontology*.  Dean was on the Life Extension Foundation 
board until he fell out with Kent over his refusal to 
recommend its products exclusively to his patients. 

  "I personally believe the FDA is a rogue government 
organization that is out of control," Dean said. 

  Fowkes, who wrote a book called "Stop the FDA," says the 
FDA shouldn't be prosecuting companies for importing drugs 
that are approved in other countries. 

  "What they're charging them with, I think, is not a 
crime," he said.  " I hope they win, even though I think 
they're unethical." 

[end]
-----
Enter <RETURN> to continue.

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=1519