X-Message-Number: 15716 From: Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 03:45:16 EST Subject: You never know... 2 Some more electomagnetic-related cryopreservation hogwash on the way: Regarding thawing, could the exact same procedures be used in reverse? And also function completely independent of any chosen rate of re-warming? As vibrating motions and electromagnet influences again resumed, liberated molecules might be precluded from forming typical icing formations based on the same pseudo-science theory. The trick would be to again advantageously manipulate ordinary hydrogen bonding schemes. You know, some or all of this hogwash could be accomplished in conjunction with current cryonics methods and even new vitrification experimentation to perhaps marginally improve existing results. On the other hand, if it could all be done on its own without requiring any chemical cryoprotectants at all, that might offer some substantial advantages to several industries. But why would a researcher wish to spend limited resources with these unlikely ideas, knowing that it is unlikely to produce and could take much time and money just to reach that conclusion? Process Patent. All other methods might be obsolete on the first day of production of the equiment/machinery/technology. Different size and scale systems could extend to many types of concerns including small sample warehousing needs in each and every hospital around the world. Cryonics organizations could buy them (not much demand there right now for overtime production I guess---but who knows about future demand). I am planning to get my lab set up right away, it should be up and running in time for my very first preliminary experiments to begin at least within the next 25 or 30 years or longer. If any one beats me to it, all the better. Its all yours with my blessings. Regards, David C. Johnson Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=15716