X-Message-Number: 16753 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 16:39:07 -0700 From: Olaf Henny <> Subject: Vitamin C fair4us References: <> In Message #16746 fair4us <> wrote: Subject: Mike Darwin & The Vitamin Controversy >An interesting observation, in light of the Saul & Bill Vitamin Company's >position, which is provided at the following: > >http://www.lef.org/featured-articles/may2000_vitamin_c_01.html > >Ah, but Mike doesn't work for them anymore, right? > >Regardless, who is the poor lay person to believe ... I d say *both*. They are not contradictory. Taken together they say: For cancer and cardiovascular protection: Vitamin C = good. For ischemic protection: Vitamin C = bad. Best, Olaf Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=16753