X-Message-Number: 17330 From: Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:47:16 EDT Subject: From : herarchy to hierarchy to hierchth From: Kennita Watson <> Subject: anarchy/hierarchy: >?Herarchy? is a non-word that sounds like it would go with ?himarchy?. >Hierarchy. Hierarchy. Hierarchy. Hierarchy. (Not intended as an >endorsement; I like the concept of anarchy, that is, as you put it, >?organization without h[i]erarchy?. >-- >May you live long and prosper, >Kennita Why not herearechi? (here are chi), the greek letter chi rendered often with X as in arXiv on the Los Alamos server would give hereareX or hierarX... Another fine solution to solve the y problem: For foreigners, the first english contact bring this question: What a lot of "th", they put them everywhere! Why have they not made a single letter for it? Well, "they" have with the thorn. In old times, it was rendered in printed form with "y"if I recall well. So ye y was ye y in print. I understand ye use of y for y is not common yese days, so no more hierarchy, I go to hierarchth! :-) From: Wesley Eddy <>: >Your insistence upon association of open-source and anarchy demonstrates >significant lack of understanding in regards to both topics. As someone >who has contributed to several open source projects, I tell you that there >is nothing even approaching remote resemblence to anarchy in the system. >Please forgive me if I doubt the OSS credentials of someone who uses an AOL >email address. My aol is not your aol: It is not aol-Time-Warner, it is aol-Cegetel-Vivendi-Universal. > Your apparent mastery of the English language at no higher >than a fifth-grade level doesn't particularly help your cause. This is too much for me, I have problems adding one and one (no smiley here). About english, I don't even know some words you use, such: "resemblence" and "relevency". Not everyone can have an .edu e-mail ... >Furthermore, as you have failed to even address my rebuttals to your claims >of anarchy in Linux development and Napster file-sharing, I assume you have >concede defeat, Oh! That was a game, I had not even figured it out. >(...) and therefore consider this discussion to be closed, and >will no longer participate in its debate on Cryonet, where its relevency is >highly questionable. Ok, I'll go back to the design of my next bomb: One foot in diameter and 10 000 psi brusting pressure. If anyone has an idea to make it cheaply, please let me know, don't forget to send a copy to the CIA, DIA and NSA, you'll spare their time and the taxpayer money :-). Yvan Bozzonetti From France and AOL. Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=17330