X-Message-Number: 18125 Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 08:29:56 -0800 From: Olaf Henny <> Subject: Off Topic: Rapport References: <> In Message #18115 J Corbally <> wrote in response to William Henderson. Subject: Qualification >William, >>It definitely only, in my experience, >>works with someone I have a rapport with. > >But why is that? If we are claiming this is a qualifier for the >experiment, then we must be able to explain it much better than just >stating the test fails when the rapport is bad. We have to know how this >can affect the test, which would be a whole ball of wax in itself. Which >takes us straight back to square one. During WWII my aunt in Germany was awaken by, what she thought was her eldest son Hans whistle. She was exited, that he had come on a surprise leave (that happened often, those days, because mail took weeks to arrive). She went all through their estate, a small hotel on a large property, looking for him, because she was convinced he gad come home. It turned out later, that this was the night Hans was killed in action in far away Russia. There was definitely rapport between mother and son and an outcry by a son to his mother at the moment of death is natural. My knowledge in physics is rather limited, but I liken that to radio waves. The receiver has to be tuned to the sender, otherwise there is no reception. Early computers used tubes and transistors to do what the brain does easily. So is it so absurd to assume, that under certain circumstances a sophisticated brain can do, what simple tubes and transistors do easily: send and receive waves of energy, which contain messages? Best, Olaf Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=18125