X-Message-Number: 21099 From: Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:51:43 EST Subject: Re: CryoNet #21077 Is MNT science-fiction --part1_14c.1b7e5ac5.2b76abbf_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Henri Kluytmans <> Subject: Is MNT science-fiction ? > >Science is about testable observational or experimental facts. > > NOPE. > > Science is about making theoretical models that can predict observational > or experimental facts. If they can predict observational or experimental facts, they are testable. If a theory can predict different things depending on an unknown parameter for example, then the observation is not a test, because it will fix the free parameter but can't refute the theory. So this one is not scientific, because it will survive the test whatever its result. It is a faith. Well, nothing forbid MNT on the theoretical ground but you can't make a road map to build them, so it is simply a science possibility, a science-fiction. Think for example about superluminal astronef, a classical of sci-fi novels. You may think this would ask for some new physics, it is not the case: The velocity of light is fixed by the interaction between real particle and virtual one from the quantum vacuum. If you find a practical way (a technological problem) to screen the interaction, the light speed can be expanded as much as you want. It seems nobody know how to tackle the problem today so it is science - fiction, not techno - fiction. MNT are in the same class: Not impossible in theory, but nobody know how to make them. My final comment is that I am very doubtful about the use of such devices in cryonics. I would be somewhat "Donaldsonian" on that point: System with nano parts, yes, nano devices, no. Yvan Bozzonetti. --part1_14c.1b7e5ac5.2b76abbf_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" [ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=21099