X-Message-Number: 22133
From: 
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 14:04:08 EDT
Subject: Re: CryoNet #22128 QFT

--part1_1c0.c2890bf.2c386d18_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



From: "Matthew S. Malek" <>

> So, depending on how you look at it, QFT could still be considered the
> summit of theoretical physics.  Yes, we know there are regions in which it
> becomes flawed.  But no other theory has yet to successfully navigate
> those regions _and_ be confirmed by any experimental evidence.  

I agree with that: set aside the neutrino mass, and everything on 

experimental ground fall in the QFT domain. We know that is not the final 
theoretical 

answer but what has been built beyond is not subject to experimental proof up to
now.

I think the main problem is the cost of experiments, beans counters are not 
interested to find what is beyond QFT (Quite Frivolious Thing for them). That 
is why I have suggested things such "black magic", the elementary form of it 
breaks one photon in a parametric down converter, one photon goes in a complex 
interferometer system, for example to test the 3rd quantification. The second 
photon, entangled with the first gets the same state, it can then transmit it 
to an arbitrary quantum system. This is a table top experiment, if it was done 
with an accelerator, my estimate is that the energy would be in the 10^19 eV 
range, one million times the LHC energy built near Geneva.

Entanglement and Tsutsui quantifications may reach that level for 
accelerators, may be one of the next steps for these machines.

Yvan Bozzonetti.

--part1_1c0.c2890bf.2c386d18_boundary

 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"

[ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] 

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=22133