X-Message-Number: 23402
From: "Gina Miller" <>
Subject: The Nanogirl News~
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 13:11:17 -0800

The Nanogirl News
February 8, 2004


Nanotech spy eyes life inside the cell. In Prey, Michael Crichton's tale of 
nanotech gone awry, a swarm of light-sensitive nanoparticles swim through a 
human body, creating the ultimate medical imaging system. In the real world, 
biochemists are hoping to go one step further, deploying viruses as 
"nano-cameras" to get a unique picture of what goes on inside living cells and a
greater understanding of how viruses themselves work. A team led by Bogdan 
Dragnea at Indiana University in Bloomington is exploiting the ability of 
viruses laden with gold to break into cells, along with the viral shell's own 
telltale response to laser light. Together these give an unprecedented picture 
of the chemical and physical activity in cells. (New Scientist 1/31/04) 
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994615


Nanostructure may be key to regeneration. A tiny new scaffold that assembles 
itself inside the body could point the way to regeneration of spinal cords and 
the ability to grow tissues ranging from bone cartilage to blood vessels, 
scientists say. "This is a magic material," said one of the scaffold's 
inventors, Northwestern University chemistry professor Samuel Stupp, who 
reported the discovery last week in Science magazine. (Sunspot 1/26/04)


http://www.sunspot.net/news/printedition/bal-te.scaffold26jan26,0,248678.story?coll=bal-pe-asection
Also see: http://www.nature.com/nsu/040119/040119-13.html


New pollution eating paint will clean the air. A new form of paint that can 
absorb some of the noxious gases from vehicle exhausts goes on sale across 
Europe next month. Its manufacturers hope it will give architects and town 
planners a new weapon in the fight against pollution, an article in New 
Scientist reports. The new product, Ecopaint, is designed to absorb nitrogen 
oxides, one of the causes of respiratory problems and smog production. Dr Robert
McIntyre, of Millenium Chemicals who developed the paint, says a typical 0.3 
millimetre layer would be enough to last five years in a heavily polluted city. 
(edie 2/6/04)


http://www.edie.net/gf.cfm?L=left_frame.html&R=http://www.edie.net/news/Archive/8025.cfm


Chemists Learn To Build Curved Structures With Nanoscale Building Blocks. The 
natural world is full of curves and three dimensions, but the ability to 
deliberately and rationally construct such complex structures using nanoscale 
building blocks has eluded nanotechnologists who are eager to add curved 
structures to their toolbox. Now a team of Northwestern University chemists 
report they have discovered ways to construct nanoscale building blocks that 
assemble into flat or curved structures with a high level of predictability, 
depending on the architecture and composition of the building blocks. The 
results are published in the Jan. 16 issue of the journal Science.

(ScienceDaily 1/19/04) 
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/01/040119082010.htm


(Written by Douglas Mulhall, author of "Our Molecular Future." Incorporate 
disassembly into every self-assembled nanotech product. There is a growing 
mantra in the nanotech community that molecular nanotechnology (MNT) and its 
precursors will clean up the toxic mess left by older technologies, then produce
clean energy and materials to replace them. Yet each time that I suggest 
building such features into nanotechnology from the start, the reply is: "We've 
got other things to worry about such as how to build the darn assembler and keep
it militarily secured, and besides that it might be hard to achieve such 
perfection with early versions." This is disturbingly reminiscent of "nuclear 
power will give us clean limitless energy, and don't worry, we'll deal with the 
byproducts later because we'll have the tools by then." However, we can avoid 
such risks from the start by using "self-regulating assembly" and "disassembly."
(Smalltimes 2/6/04) http://www.smalltimes.com/print_doc.cfm?doc_id=7382


Nano-scientist's dark secret. One of the most brilliant scientific researchers 
of recent years stands accused of committing an elaborate scientific fraud, 
fooling many eminent experts. In 2001, a team led by Hendrik Schoen appeared to 
have invented the smallest organic transistor ever made. 
(BBC 2/4/04) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3459769.stm


National Nanotechnology Initiative Workshop on Nano-electronics, photonics, and 
-magnets. A National Nanotechnology Initiative Interagency Workshop on 
Nano-electronics, -photonics, and -magnetics, will be held Feb. 11-13, 2004, at 
the Holiday Inn Arlington at Ballston, Arlington, VA. Media are invited to 
attend this workshop where leading scientists and engineers from government, 
academia and industry will exchange information, research findings and ideas 
toward identifying needs and opportunities for applications of nanostructured 
materials and devices. A draft agenda is available. (EurekAlert 2/5/04) 
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2004-02/nnco-nni020504.php


Elements 115 and 113 discovered in Dubna. A team of Russian and American 
physicists that discovered elements 114 and 116 in 1998 and 2000 now believe 
they may have created two other superheavy elements - 113 and 115. If confirmed,
these results would lend even more weight to the idea of an "island of 
stability" at the edge of the periodic table (Y Oganessian et al. 2003 Phys. 
Rev. C 69 021601) (Physics Web 2/3/04) 
http://www.physicsweb.org/article/news/8/2/1


Electromagnets double up. Physicists in the US have developed a new technique 
for making nanostructures that have both ferroelectric and ferromagnetic 
properties. So-called ferroelectromagnetic materials could be used to help 
convert electric energy into magnetic energy, and vice versa, in devices such as
transducers, sensors and actuators (H Zheng et al. 2004 Science 303 661). 
(Physics web 1/30/04) http://physicsweb.org/article/news/8/1/15


Functionalized C60 Peas in a Pod. Fullerene derivatives are inserted into carbon
nanotubes at low temperatures. Using supercritical carbon dioxide, scientists 
in England have inserted fullerene molecules with exterior organic functional 
groups into single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs). The team also showed that 
encapsulation of the functionalized fullerenes can be enhanced or inhibited by 
altering the functional group. (C&E 1/26/04) 
http://pubs.acs.org/cen/topstory/8204/8204notw4.html


'Centipedes' could lead to nano-Velcro. Scientists from the University of 
Michigan and Purdue University in the US, and the University of Vigo in Spain, 
have made "bristled nano-centipedes". The structures consist of a bristled 
silica coating on a cadmium tellurium (CdTe) nanowire core. "We were initially 
dumbfounded by the formation of the centipedes," Nick Kotov of the University of
Michigan told nanotechweb.org. "The topology of the nanowires is very 
interesting - it could be exceptionally useful for the design of optically 
active and remarkably strong nanocomposites, due to the 'Velcro' effect." 
(nanotechweb 1/21/04) http://nanotechweb.org/articles/news/3/1/5/1


(Glenn Harlan Reynolds) The Nano-Ostrich Approach Doesn't Work. Ostriches don't 
really bury their heads in the sand when confronted with danger. People, 
however, sometimes do. Certainly that seems to be what's happening with the 
nanotechnology industry. Last week, I wrote about prospects for nanotechnology, 
and in particular about what I saw as the nanotechnology business community's 
rather shortsighted efforts to dampen public debate on the subject. I thought it
was rather clear that my column, like all my nanotechnology writings, came from
a generally pro-nanotechnology standpoint, though I concluded: [W]hile I feel a
certain degree of sympathy for the dinosaurs, I think that if the 
nanotechnology business community, because of the PR strategy that it has 
chosen, finds itself scissored between the scientists and visionaries on one 
side, and the environmentalists on the other, it will have cause to regret its 
rather shortsighted PR strategy. It's too early to predict that outcome now. 
But, like a lot of things relating to nanotechnology, it's not too early to 
worry about it. In fact, it wasn't very much too soon at all -- because if you 
read this Washington Post article by Rick Weiss, which appeared just a few days 
after my column, you can see exactly that scissoring starting to take place. The
article, which is well worth reading (as is this sidebar on near-term 
applications), shows the industry being criticized not only by environmental 
groups, but by long-time nanotechnology boosters. And, in fact, it suggests that
Monsanto's problems with public fears regarding its genetically modified 
organisms are a harbinger of what might happen with regard to nanotechnology. 
(TCS 2/4/04) http://www.techcentralstation.com/020504C.html


Paper warns of 'Nano-divide' between have and have-not countries. The chasm 
between have and have-not countries will grow even wider if nanotechnology 
research is upended by the unbalanced positions of high-profile opponents like 
Prince Charles, warns a new analysis from a leading global medical ethics 
think-tank. Nanotechnology is the building of working devices, systems and 
materials molecule by molecule by manipulating matter measured in billionths of 
a meter. The research seeks to exploit the unique and powerful electrical, 
physical and chemical properties found at an infinitesimally small scale. While 
legitimate risks and issues have been flagged, they can and should be addressed 
without a crippling moratorium being called for on budding research that 
promises vast improvement in the lives of five billion people in developing 
countries, according to medical ethics experts at the University of Toronto 
Joint Centre for Bioethics. (nanotechwire 1/28/04) 
http://nanotechwire.com/news.asp?nid=675


Asian-Pacific Governments Invest in Nano Labs and Research Centers. A number of 
new research parks have opened in the Asia-Pacific region in the past few 
months, illustrating an increased level of commitment by local governments 
toward investment in nanotechnology and related fields. 

(Smalltimes 1/22/04) 
http://www.smalltimes.com/document_display.cfm?document_id=7269


Nano not terrifying. American scientists said recently the application of 
nanotechnology could affect human health as nanometer scale particles can easily
penetrate the human body and may cause diseases. Meanwhile Chinese scientists 
say this negative aspect of nanotechnology should not be exaggerated...Dr. Jiang
Lei, with the Chinese Academy of Sciences, has been engaged in the research of 
nanotechnology for years. He says the test result is one-sided. "Nano particles 
do exist and can easily penetrate into the respiratory tract and skin of human 
beings. But there is also a question of quantity. How many such particles could 
affect human health? At the present no scientists anywhere are able to answer 
this." Dr. Jiang Lei also tells us how to protect ourselves in nano research. 
"In the course of research, we can try our best to avoid the presence of 
nano-scale objects in particle form. However in the liquid or solid states they 
are unable to penetrate human bodies." (1/14/03) 
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-01/14/content_1275787.htm


The Center for Responsible Nanotechnology 'Plans Ahead'. On Jan. 21-26, 2004, 
the Center for Responsible Nanotechnology (CRN) posted a six-page article 
entitled "Responsible Nanotechnology."The article describes eight scenarios for 
the future of mankind in connection with molecular nanotechnology, including 
molecular nano assemblers, capable of destroying enemy means of nuclear 
retaliation and thus circumventing Mutual Assured Destruction, on which the 
peace between the three nuclear powers (the USA, Russia and China) has rested. 
(2/6/04)
http://newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/2/5/182324.shtml


Nanotechnology is area giant. Here's one of the "Look Ma, no hands" perks of 
owning a stain-repellent shirt: Fill up the pocket with water and watch it hold 
the liquid like a cup, without any leakage. "All you need is a straw," quipped 
David Offord, chief scientific officer at Nano-Tex, the start-up that developed 
the technology, during a demonstration. Naturally, the regular marketed 
advantages of owning stain- and liquid-repellent clothing come in handy, too. 
Enhanced through nanotechnology, the material allows even the clumsiest person 
who dribbles ketchup or spills coffee to wipe it off as easily as brushing off 
cookie crumbs. Here in the East Bay, nanotechnology has become the fabric of our
lives. (ContraCostaTimes 2/1/04) 
http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/business/7849397.htm


(65nm Chips discussion). Semiconductor companies are becoming increasingly 
confident about making 65 nanometer chips. Some are even stating that the 90 nm 
to 65 nm transition will be easier than the 130 nm to 90 nm shift. Many of the 
technical problems associated with 65 nm chip production have been solved, and 
Intel has already demonstrated 65 nanometer SRAM chips. Intel will probably 
create the first prototype 65 nanometer microprocessors sometime in 2004, and 
hopes to have volume production of 65 nanometer chips by 2005. 65 nanometer 
chips will be made with 193 nanometer lithography, and will suffer from severe 
electrical leakage issues. As a result, chipmakers are making a concerted effort
to introduce multi-gate transistors at the 65 nanometer node.

(Geek.com 2/6/04) 
http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2004Feb/bch20040206023770.htm


Reverse-direction Movement of a Molecular Motor. German scientists mastermind a 
backwards-moving molecular motor. In a new study, which appears in the Feb. 5 
issue of Nature, researchers based at Hannover Medical School and the Max Planck
Institute for Medical Research in Germany describe the engineering of an 
artificial backwards-moving myosin from three pre-existing molecular building 
blocks. (MaxPlanck Society 2/4/04) HTML: 
http://www.mpg.de/english/illustrationsDocumentation/documentation/pressReleases/2004/pressRelease20040203/index.html
PDF:


http://www.mpg.de/english/illustrationsDocumentation/documentation/pressReleases/2004/pressRelease20040203/genPDF.pdf


Weighed in the nanoscale. It's no longer 'scary science' in tomorrow's world. 
With decisions looming on our nanotech future, Vidhya Alakeson and Tim Aldrich 
look at how to win public engagement. They're coming - big time. Heavyweight 
reports with nanotechnology in their titles are hitting our bookshelves with 
increasing frequency. Since the last Green Futures article on this little 
understood technology of the seriously small [GF34], we've a pile of studies by 
everyone from the ETC Group and Greenpeace to the Economic and Social Research 
Council and the Better Regulation Taskforce. (Green Futures 2/7/04) 
http://www.greenfutures.org.uk/features/default.asp?id=1723


Virtual Nanotech. Modeling materials one atom at a time. It's hard enough to 
thread a needle. Imagine trying to manipulate threads and needles miniaturized 
to one-millionth the normal size. Now, you're thinking like the emerging group 
of nanotechnologists whose growing dexterity at fashioning new materials and 
devices may eventually improve every arena of technology, from aerospace to drug
development. While many researchers focus on developing tools for working on 
nanoscale materials, others are pursuing a virtual pathway toward nanotechnology
applications. As ever-more powerful computers have become ever more affordable,
computational nanoscientists can readily simulate materials atom by atom. 
(ScienceNews 2/7/04) http://www.sciencenews.org/20040207/bob8.asp

Gina "Nanogirl" Miller
Nanotechnology Industries
http://www.nanoindustries.com
Personal: http://www.nanogirl.com
Foresight Senior Associate http://www.foresight.org
Nanotechnology Advisor Extropy Institute  http://www.extropy.org
Tech-Aid Advisor http://www.tech-aid.info/t/all-about.html

"Nanotechnology: Solutions for the future."


 Content-Type: text/html;

[ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] 

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=23402