X-Message-Number: 26136 From: Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 07:26:39 EDT Subject: Re: CryoNet #26119 To T. Donaldson. From T. Donaldson: > Hello Mr Bozzonetti again: > > Your answer f ails once more. You forgot that the neuron is new and > therefore may not be on any table. Moreover you once more want to put > some number of neurons on the same chip. Ridiculous and even worse, > if you were ever to actually make such a system, disappointing. I don't understand that garbage, where come from that idea of a new neuron not registered on any table? If two neurons make a new synaptic link, as I have said, a new entry in the table is added, if one of the neuron is new, creating it is mostly creating addresses in the different tables for it. A modern chip will simulate a neuron block (may be 1,000 individual neurons) in 0.001% of its time, why did you insist that the processor must remains idle 99.999 % of the time ? Yvan Bozzonetti. Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" [ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=26136