X-Message-Number: 26177 Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 01:57:53 -0400 From: "Kevin Q. Brown" <> Subject: Re: CryoNet rating choices In CryoNet message #26169 Randolfe Wicker suggested adding ratings of "Excellent", "Good", and "Poor" to the list of rating options at http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi and also suggested changing "Normal" to "Average". I just added the three new options, but left "Normal" unchanged since the rating data already includes many instances of "Normal". As one would expect, "Excellent" is better than "Good", which is much better than "Poor". The provisional "probability of spam" values associated with these new ratings are 0.05, 0.15, and 0.75, respectively. Kevin Q. Brown Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=26177