X-Message-Number: 26177
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 01:57:53 -0400
From: "Kevin Q. Brown" <>
Subject: Re: CryoNet rating choices

In CryoNet message #26169 Randolfe Wicker suggested adding ratings of
"Excellent", "Good", and "Poor" to the list of rating options at
     http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi
and also suggested changing "Normal" to "Average".  I just added
the three new options, but left "Normal" unchanged since the rating
data already includes many instances of "Normal".

As one would expect, "Excellent" is better than "Good", which is
much better than "Poor".  The provisional "probability of spam"
values associated with these new ratings are 0.05, 0.15, and 0.75,
respectively.

     Kevin Q. Brown
     

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=26177