X-Message-Number: 26710
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:17:52 -0500
From: The NanoAging Institute <>
Subject: Re: Growth

From Brian Wowk from my personal email:

"It's extremely unlikely that Pichugin's solution is as good as M22. 
It's easy to make a mixture of cryoprotectants that will vitrify at
any cooling rate, especially if you don't use electron microscopy to
check the preservation.  It's making a mixture with low toxicity that
is very hard."

Alcor is using M22 but not CI and I dont understand why CI invest so
many energy to discover new solution for vitrification. The money
should be directed toward one team to discover one good solution.

So CI is not very great after all I dont understand their point

--Jon

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=26710