X-Message-Number: 26710 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:17:52 -0500 From: The NanoAging Institute <> Subject: Re: Growth From Brian Wowk from my personal email: "It's extremely unlikely that Pichugin's solution is as good as M22. It's easy to make a mixture of cryoprotectants that will vitrify at any cooling rate, especially if you don't use electron microscopy to check the preservation. It's making a mixture with low toxicity that is very hard." Alcor is using M22 but not CI and I dont understand why CI invest so many energy to discover new solution for vitrification. The money should be directed toward one team to discover one good solution. So CI is not very great after all I dont understand their point --Jon Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=26710