X-Message-Number: 26857
References: <>
From: David Stodolsky <>
Subject: Re: Anonymity and the Wakfers
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 22:13:07 +0200

On 20 Aug 2005, at 05:01, Kitty Antonik Wakfer wrote:

>  If anyone has criticism
> of the assumptions or reasoning in those essays, then post a  
> critique to any
> appropriate public forum (after reading the essays of course, which  
> is doubtful was
> done by the writer of the message to which this is a reply).

Sorry, but anonymity is accepted in science (in fact, the role of the  
scientist did not even exist before anonymous peer review) and many  
other areas. It is up to you to present a critique, if you wish to  
claim it is not justified in any form. So, you are welcome to read my  
papers and present your criticism. (Not to mention that peer reviewed  
material in a respected scientific journal has greater credibility  
than a web page.)


dss



David Stodolsky    Skype: davidstodolsky

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=26857