X-Message-Number: 27010
References: <>
From: Kennita Watson <>
Subject: Re: cemetery
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 03:19:32 -0700

On Sep 12, 2005, at 2:00 AM, Charles Platt <> wrote:

> Since CI was reclassified as a cemetery, they have lost the
> capability to perform procedures in house. Is that your
> objective too? You want to be prohibited from performing
> cryoprotective perfusion, for instance? As a cemetery, you
> can store people. Period. Unless the laws in your state are
> VERY differnt from those in Michigan, Arizona, California,
> and Florida (the states where I am familiar with
> regulations).

Would it work to have two organizations next door to
each other -- the first classified as a mortuary, performing
washout, perfusion, and temperature lowering rather than
embalming, and the other classified as a cemetery, performing
cryogenic storage rather than burial?

Live long and prosper,
Kennita
--
Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery;
none but ourselves can free our minds.
           -- Bob Marley, "Redemption Song"

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=27010