X-Message-Number: 29335
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:20:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: Charles Platt <>
Subject: Re: CryoNet #29325 - #29328
References: <>

> Message #29328
> From: "marta sandberg" <>
> Subject: The ethics of last-minute cases
> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:46:55 +0800
>
> I have a very serious problem with Chares Platt's.  To deny a patient the
> right to be frozen if a hostile relative exist will bar at least
> three-quarters of the current cases and mean that any relative of mine who
> don't like cryonics will have veto power over my choice.

This is not what I meant. Sorry I don't have time to go back
and look it up now, but either I wasn't clear or Marta
Sandberg misunderstood me.

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=29335