X-Message-Number: 29494 Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 00:35:18 -0400 From: Keith Henson <> Subject: Keith Henson's adventures with court corruption Just to keep you up on the ongoing events. There is a hearing Tue., May 8 at which I might be returned to this corrupt county. Keith Federal Bureau of Investigation Los Angeles Field Office 11000 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1700 Los Angeles, California 90024 email: Main telephone number: (310) 477-6565 To Whom It May Concern: This letter is being sent by email and "snail" mail in a further attempt with hard evidence this time to reach law-enforcement agents who might actually attempt to enforce the laws against public corruption and violation of civil rights. According to the FBI Web site, "The FBI investigates violations of federal law by public officials at the local, state and federal levels of government. These violations typically relate to bribery and misuse of office for personal gain by individuals in positions of public trust." The site also states that, as to civil rights, "The FBI is the primary federal agency with responsibility for investigating allegations of federal civil rights violations and abuses. This includes investigations of hate crimes perpetrated by individuals and members of racist groups and investigations into allegations of misconduct of law enforcement officers, including physical abuse and deprivation of rights through fabrication of evidence." My husband Keith Henson and I have tried for years to report violations of the public trust and violations of his civil rights to agents of the FBI, most recently to the Riverside FBI office, but they didn't respond, and the Riverside office has no listed email. My husband and I have believed for years that the Riverside County District attorney, in the person of deputy district attorney Tom Gage, attempted to entrap him into "failure to appear" by making false representations in the court. Closer to the event, my husband wrote a letter to a deputy sheriff in Riverside named Secor, and if you Google "Secor Henson," you will easily find a facsimile of the letter (the wording of the letter is attached). My husband still has physical evidence in the form of the never folded, never mailed "notice to appear." Now it appears that a (now dead) judge and other Riverside County court personnel were also involved in this still active crime. In February of this year my husband acquired a warrant produced by the Riverside County Sheriff's Department dated September 15, 2000. An image of the warrant is Webbed at http://www3.sympatico.ca/jdorsay/henson. This warrant, which cites case HEM014371, is obviously the instrument by which my husband would have been arrested at a deposition too far from the arraignment site to manage both events. There is no other excuse for this warrant's (previously hidden) existence. We believe it to be fraudulent and implicating court officials of federal crime because: 1. The date on the warrant cannot be reconciled with the court docket, in which it is not listed. The docket shows my husband appeared early on September 15. 2. The warrant lists a crime, Califiornia Penal Code 1320-A, "failure to appear," which simply did not occur on that date. 3. Because the "crime" did not happen on September 15, 2000, the warrant with this charge could not have been created on that date. It was obviously created prior to that date, probably at the same time as the "notice to appear." 3. The warrant is "BY ORDER OF THE HONORABLE Robert H. Wallerstein JUDGE." This is evidence Judge Wallerstein was involved in my husband's case 7 months before he became his trial judge. 4. The warrant issued in his name and the fact that Judge Wallerstein did not disclose his previous involvement in my husband's case violates at least three Canons of the California Code of Judicial Ethics. 5. Other personnel, particularly DDA Tom Gage and the court clerk who signed the arrest warrant, were also involved in these criminal acts. Judge Wallerstein manipulated the case record to eliminate my husband's appeal issues, gagged his defense using "motions in limine" clearly not written by the district attorney's office but by a third party, and committed many errors and omissions, including "sealing" part of the record by telling the clerk not to transcribe it, whereupon a key declaration and document disappeared from the official record. He also, in my presence, told an attorney supposedly working for the alleged "victims" in the case, who supervised and directed every detail of the prosecution, that he had known him while in Orange County but "didn't want to say so during the trial for obvious reasons." (The attorney, actually working for the cult of Scientology, replied to my comment that I hoped that in his case what goes around would come around soon that "It already has.") There is a write up in more detail here: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/ad14dc144b7d7d87?hl=en& There is nothing so disturbing as finding the courts are tools for an organization (Scientology) that the FBI classifies as organized crime. Back in the late 1970s the FBI raided Scientology with 135 Agents and turned up a remarkable treasure trove of papers documenting crimes ranging from corrupting law enforcement to treason in the US and in other countries. As you may know, this organization is a convicted corporation in Canada for similar crimes, and has been expelled from Greece, as well as being under watch in other countries due to its criminal actions. I have been given to understand that the FBI is not permitted to investigate religions and political groups, but active corruption of local courts should fall into what the FBI can investigate, particularly when it also has deprived an individual of his civil rights. Sincerely and hopefully, Arel Lucas P. O. Box 12241 Prescott, Arizona 86304 (323) 712-5492 Letter to Serg. Secor 13 Apr 2001 Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=29494