X-Message-Number: 29896
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 08:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Phil Ossifur <>
Subject: CRYONET-- cryonics alert system-- C.A.S.

In terms of wiring cryonicists and  cryonics watchers
together, CryoNet still can serve a useful function--
despite its failure at conducting conversations due to
lack of threads-- a technique picked up by Cold Filter
and and other blogs and forums. 

Cold Filter http://www.network54.com/Forum/291677/

Given upcoming world problems-- we should consider
CryoNet-- which still a viable tool-- as the primary
email-box-connected way to generate messages-- both as
a switchboard to threads in forums better suited for
conversation-- and as a "cryonics alert system". 

Further and deeper discussion of ideas should be
linked from blogs and discussion forums, when they
become developed enough-- to CryoNet so that CryoNet
email readers are updated on important issues. It's
specifically the email box function that makes CryoNet
valuable now-- that--and the fact that it has history
back to 1988. 

So what's happened here, in my view, is exactly what I
predicted-- that CryoNet would become a valuable
"switchboard". However, it now occurs to me that in
ADDITION to being a switchboard, it's a sort of
cryonics emergency channel. 

To make that work in an optimal way, CryoNet users and
readers should train themselves to think in terms of
keywords-- not hard to do since Google has trained us
all to do that-- but in addition to thinking about a
meaningful keyword-- we should place THAT keyword in
the subject line of a Cryonet post. Sub-keywords are
useful too as you can see from my own posts.

--PhilOssifur-- pseudonymn of an Alcor member. 








       


____________________________________________________________________________________
Need a vacation? Get great deals
to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.
http://travel.yahoo.com/

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=29896

Warning: This message was filtered from the daily CryoNet digest
because the poster's reputation was too low.
It thus may need to be rated.