X-Message-Number: 30294
References: <>
From: Kennita Watson <>
Subject: Re: The Cryonet Rating System 
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:12:38 -0800

hrhirsch wrote:

> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:54:01 -0500
> From: hrhirsch <>
> Subject: The Cryonet Rating System
>
> If the articles in our daily newspapers - even the good ones like the
> NY Times and the Washington Post - were rated like our Cryonet
> postings, the papers would be two pages in length on average. I scan
> through the newspaper reading the headlines and bylines and decide
> for myself which articles to pursue further. It would not help me to
> have the articles rated by others and to have items written by
> authors of low reputation placed in a separate journal. Maybe I am
> the only one who feels this way. Please respond.

I'm with you.  I *hate* the rating system,
but I held my nose and used it to rate
Dave Pizer's recent messages Excellent so
he could post again.  Censorship sucks.
*grump*

Live long and prosper,
Kennita
--
Register Republican NOW so you can vote for Ron Paul in the
primary (http://www.fec.gov/votregis/vr.shtml) then switch
back.  Also, go to RonPaulBlimp.com -- you could win a ride!

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=30294