X-Message-Number: 31053 From: "FlavO Noid" <> Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 20:51:43 -0500 Subject: To David Stodolsky re: Disease & Cryonics --_----------=_122135710347130 Content-Disposition: inline Your post on this subject, in particular psychiatric disease, makes little sense as to the conclusions you appear to draw. Therefore I would ask you to define "social component" and "cryonics 'package'". Please explain why you appear to think that psychiatric disease is so special that it should be somehow be addressed in current cryonics practice, while other diseases are not. And if I am not misunderstanding you and you do think that, please explain exactly what you think cryonics providers should now be doing relative to psychiatric disease. (I could nominate a few individuals for the program :-) ) The prevalent thought seems to be that fixing problems of various diseases is relevant to the reanimation phase of cryonics, not the phase we are in today. -- Be Yourself @ mail.com! Choose From 200+ Email Addresses Get a Free Account at www.mail.com --_----------=_122135710347130 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" [ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=31053