X-Message-Number: 31778
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:54:50 +0200
Subject: Re: Possible Experiment?
From: yvan Bozzonetti <>

--000e0cd29d0ed37137046d7eb5bc

I think such an experiment would fall.
The cryopreserving solution is toxic, more, it don't carry oxygen. In the
dog case, the cold saved him.
Something along this was done many years ago with a chloro-fluorocarbon mix.

There was survival because the product can carry a lot of oxygen, is not
toxic and has a low viscosity.

The real problem yet is not here, it is with a technology able to repair the
freezing molecular scale destruction.
I would say the first step would be to have a scanning system able to map a
body at that scale.
Sadly, no cryonics organization want to do such research, even if it cost
nothing.

Yvan Bozzonetti.


> From: "Kennita (Go Cryo!)" <>
> Subject: Possible Experiment?
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 02:41:45 -0700
>
> How much would it cost to washout a mouse, to perfuse it with our
> latest vitrification solution, to replace the blood, and to attempt to
> revive the mouse? How long would it take? Who should perform the
> experiment? Given that a similar experiment was successfully completed
> on a dog years ago (with the added step of lowering the temperature to
> near freezing) using the more primitive cryoprotectant, what would you
> say the chances are of ending up with a live, functional mouse?
>
> Live long and prosper,
> Kennita
>

--000e0cd29d0ed37137046d7eb5bc

 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

[ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] 

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=31778