X-Message-Number: 32577
Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 21:28:37 +0200
Subject: Re: migration for cryonics
From: yvan Bozzonetti <>

--00032555932ea837370485a17b75

> From: "John de Rivaz" <>
>
>   <...>
>
> I don't think that there is any specific law against cryonics as there may
> be in some countries.
>
> To an extent these three are all interleaved. Undoubtedly there would be
> vast sums of money to be taken for compliance costs which may make it more
> the difficult to find what is needed for buying a building, equiping it, and
> endowing a fund to pay staff. The costs of a caretaker could be avoided by
> siting it near someone willing to do it for free, but then once he is under
> cryopreservation there may not be anyone else in the same area.
>

Could it be possible to use at first a simple shelter?
May be something as a greenhouse?
It seems that could be sufficient for weather protection of a cryostat.
That could reduce the cost and the  law overload...
Body preparation has not to be done in the same place. It would be better,
yes, but if that induce too much cost at start, it may be counterproductive.
I know the neuro only has some bad press, yet it would reduce the capital
investment at start (cryostat, LN2,...) A brain can be moved in a cheap
transport container at LN2 temperature without liquid content.
The cost for up to 10 brains would be near L3.00/day, L1000.00/year.

Yvan Bozzonetti.

--00032555932ea837370485a17b75

 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

[ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] 

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=32577