X-Message-Number: 4162
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 1995 20:45:46 -0400
From: "Keith F. Lynch" <>
Subject: Re: SCI.CRYONICS Liar

> ... as far as I know there is no example of a statement that "should"
> be regarded as clearly meaningful, yet is clearly unverifiable in
> principle. Perhaps a reader will supply his favorite example (not
> counting Goedelian "examples").

How about "there is no example of a statement that should be regarded
as clearly meaningful, yet is clearly unverifiable in principle"?
That statement appears to be meaningful, but I sure can't see how to
verify it, can you?


Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=4162