X-Message-Number: 6218 Date: Thu, 16 May 96 10:07:31 From: Mike Perry <> Subject: Re "One Life is Enough" David Stodolsky (#6210) writes, regarding the problem of "conformity" and the non-acceptance of cryonics: >There is no substitute for examining the scientific >work in this area, if you want to use that knowledge to affect the >acceptance of cryonics. A good point to make--I intend to examine the literature. Saul Kent, meanwhile (#6207) suggests that people don't look to each other for standards to conform to--but instead they look to authority figures. (I wonder what the literature has to say about that?) If true (and it sounds reasonable) it suggests we should try to win over those who are recognized as "authority figures." In fact efforts *have* been made in this direction but our success so far has been less than spectacular. One wonders what, mainly, holds back the "authority figures" themselves? Is it fear of losing their "authority" status if they are seen as endorsing such a "crazy" idea as cryonics? Mike Perry http://www.alcor.org Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=6218