X-Message-Number: 6490
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 11:19:38 -0400
From: Ken Stone <>
Subject: Fringe benefits of Prometheus ownership

Paul Wakfer raised the question of 'what level of pledge' should a 
cryonics provider have to make to Prometheus before it is allowed 
royalty-free use of Promethean-derived technology.

The answer: that provider should own 100% of Prometheus in order to 
do this.  Granting royalty-free use to any cryonics companies would 
erode the financial interests of all other shareholders.  Proceeds 
deriving from Prometheus should be split equally amongst all 
of its investors.  Anything else is a form of fraud, even when it
is legally acceptable.


Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=6490