X-Message-Number: 8566 Date: Mon, 8 Sep 1997 21:46:27 -0700 (PDT) From: John K Clark <> Subject: A Turing Test -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- "John P. Pietrzak" <> Wrote: >This is exactly the wall AI hit in the 70's. Many programs were >written such that they acted in a smart way You could be right about that. >For a while, people believed that they were intelligent. "intelligent" is the key. >Until we understand what the "missing" part is, AI will continue to >flounder. "flounder" is the key. >Once your definition of intelligence involves a purely subjective >measure, Why do you once your definition of intelligence involves a purely subjective measure? >it passes outside the realm of science. Maybe yes maybe no. >(e.g., "Hey! I did it! I created an artificial intelligence! Depends on what you mean by "created". >Meet my pet rock, Bob. Depends on what you mean by "Bob" . >Hey, now, Hello. >waitaminnit, you never told me there was a limit on who the tester >could be! I did tell you there was a waitaminnit limit on who the tester could be! >Please, define for me exactly, who can and cannot be used as a >tester for the Turing Test. Why do you Please, define for me exactly, who can and cannot be used as a Tester for the Turing Test? >These N interrogators standing behind me Maybe yes maybe no. >were unable to tell its answers apart from a human using the Turing >Test. You could be right about that. John K Clark -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.i iQCzAgUBNBTQ7X03wfSpid95AQH3gQTw5x108nN4ND/hO09Y0nF8KqQPoTowcjeK +HrIv2bGlbkaNVwYEEqlIYGOZL/1ZgepNy6mGPaarU/9iOR6OMxN0RB/fA+S0u7r wY7Rn1pf+oIm0sXACSKQMc+ibiJ2333RMZ+Mhzubp0uSGDvuQ+AGCqzrtFHFliL+ VTfoJrjzRuX2poMJyHhgf8tYayjj9IiS+TyFGaBH/+g46vE7JYg=Ma3c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=8566