X-Message-Number: 8749
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 1997 17:55:42 -0700
From: David Brandt-Erichsen <>
Subject: Oregon update

From the PORTLAND OREGONIAN
(Saturday Nov 8/97)

                       DEA DEEMS SUICIDE LAW ILLEGAL

   Oregon doctors could lose their right to prescribe some drugs if they
                            assist in a suicide

              Steve Suo and Erin Hoover of The Oregonian staff


     The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration has determined that
     prescribing lethal medication to assist in a suicide violates
     federal narcotics law - meaning Oregon doctors could lose their
     right to prescribe some drugs if they aid in a suicide.

     Thomas A. Constantine, DEA administrator, wrote the chairmen of the
     U.S. House and Senate judiciary committees in a letter dated
     Wednesday that "delivering, dispensing or prescribing a controlled
     substance with the intent of assisting a suicide" is not a
     "legitimate medical purpose" allowed by law.

     The letter responded to an inquiry from Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah,
     and Rep. Henry J. Hyde, R-Ill. They told Constantine earlier this
     year that Congress "would have a serious concern" if the agency
     allowed doctors to prescribe drugs for suicides.

     It remained unclear Friday how far the Clinton administration would
     go in backing up Constantine's interpretation of the law. The
     Oregonian obtained a copy of his letter only a day after the DEA
     acknowledged to the newspaper that the state's physician-assisted
     suicide law was under review.

     Administration officials and assisted-suicide supporters played
     down the possibility of sanctions against doctors.

     "The Justice Department is continuing to review this, and no
     conclusions have been reached," spokesman Gregory King said. The
     Drug Enforcement Administration is an arm of the Justice
     Department.

     But an administrator for the DEA's Portland subdivision, which
     received Constantine's letter Friday, said his office would start
     proceedings against doctors who clearly prescribed drugs to aid in
     suicide.

     "Assuming that the medical examiner or whatever ruled this death to
     be suicide, and assuming someone . . . dropped it in our lap, I
     don't think we would have any choice but to proceed," said Arnold
     Lochner, group supervisor of the Portland DEA's diversion program.
     "But are we going to go scouring the medical records? Probably
     not."

     News about the agency's involvement exploded into political clashes
     from Oregon to Capitol Hill. Rep. Darlene Hooley and Sen. Ron
     Wyden, both Oregon Democrats, sent letters to Attorney General
     Janet Reno saying there is no need for the administration to
     intervene.

     And in a tense confrontation on a Capitol elevator,cq. Rep. Peter
     DeFazio, D-Ore., taunted Hyde for trying to bring federal law to
     bear on an issue Oregon voters had settled Tuesday, when they
     overwhelmingly defeated a measure to repeal assisted suicide.

     "He won't do anything - Henry believes in states' rights," DeFazio
     said.

     "When they're right," Hyde fired back.

     "Have you ever seen someone die in horrible, horrible pain?"
     DeFazio said.

     Yes, Hyde said: his wife.

     DeFazio said he had seen his father die painfully and that no one
     should have to go through such an experience. When he started to
     describe how horrible it is when someone has trouble breathing,
     Hyde yelled, "Don't tell me how it is."

     Sen. Gordon Smith, R-Ore., was the only member of the Oregon
     delegation who applauded the DEA's finding.

     "I'm not a supporter of assisted suicide," Smith said. "I respect
     the vote of the people, but I also understand that this is a law
     that has consequences far beyond the border of Oregon, and it may
     contravene federal law."

     The law, approved by voters as Measure 16 in 1994, allows mentally
     competent, terminally ill patients to request a lethal
     prescription.

     DEA controls prescriptions

     In a July 25cq. letter to the DEA, Hyde and Hatch argued that the
     federal Controlled Substances Act prohibits doctors from
     prescribing drugs except for a legitimate medical purpose.

     Although physicians are licensed to practice medicine by states,
     the agency registers doctors to prescribe controlled substances,
     including barbiturates and most other drugs that could be used in
     physician-assisted suicide.

     The ability to prescribe controlled substances is so crucial to
     many doctors that having their DEA registration revoked could put
     them out of business. They would be unable to prescribe such common
     painkillers such as Tylenol with codeine, for example.

     The National Conference of Catholic Bishops has pushed the view
     that Oregon's law conflicts with federal drug regulations. The
     conference raised the issue in testifying against assisted suicide
     before Hyde's committee in 1996 and before another committee in
     March.

     On June 26, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled there is no constitutional
     right to suicide and left it to the states to debate the issue.
     Shortly afterward, the organization asked Hyde to look into whether
     Oregon's law could be in conflict with federal drug law.

     Hyde contacted Hatch, said Richard Doerflinger of the bishops'
     conference.

     "We've been trying to get them interested in it for some time,"
     Doerflinger said. "I think the prospect that the Oregon law might
     be allowed to kick back into effect made it more of a timely
     issue."

     Doerflinger said the issue was a legitimate one for the federal
     government to be taking up.

     "I found it interesting that no one was noticing that Oregon
     citizens are also citizens of the United States," he said. "There
     are lots of implications for other states, and federal policy that
     has to be addressed somehow."

     The American Medical Association is on record as opposing assisted
     suicide. But a spokesman said Friday the professional association
     hadn't asked congressional leaders to intervene in Oregon and has
     not taken a position on DEA inolvement.

     Suicide supporters skeptical

     Supporters of Oregon's law vowed to sue the DEA if the agency moves
     against doctors. But they remained skeptical the administration
     would do so.

     In California this year, the agency threatened to act against
     doctors who recommended medicinal marijuana to patients under a
     voter-approved initiative. A group of doctors sued, and in April
     they won a temporary court injunction blocking the DEA from
     threatening or sanctioning doctors.

     Eli Stutsman, a laywer for Oregon Right to Die, said he is
     confident Oregon doctors can write lethal prescriptions without
     violating federal drug law. The fact that Oregon voters approved
     the assisted suicide makes it a legitimate medical purpose under
     the Controlled Substances Act, he said.

     "I'm not aware of any hard information from the DEA that they would
     sanction doctors who follow the Death With Dignity Law," said Dr.
     Rick Bayer, a Portland phyisican and a supporter of doctor-assisted
     suicide. However, "We're certainly in favor of clarification," he
     said.

     Bill Wyatt, chief of staff to Gov. John Kitzhaber, said the
     governor has no indication that the White House has taken a
     position.

     He said Kitzhaber, a doctor, thinks it's up to Oregon voters "to
     determine what appropriate medical practice is, and they have done
     so."

     "Short of specific legal prohibitions, we expect Oregon doctors
     should be able to operate under Oregon law without federal
     intervention, and we believe that will happen," Wyatt said.

     White House noncommittal

     Administration officials were noncommittal. White House spokesman
     Mike McCurry reiterated President Clinton's opposition to
     doctor-assisted suicide but said he "would want to check" with
     Clinton about his stance on Oregon's law.

     If the federal government decides to intervene, it could quickly
     end up in a legal thicket.

     "This is very much a states' rights issue, balanced against the
     power that the national government has operated under for a long
     time - regulating interstate transportation," said Richard Shugrue,
     a professor at Creighton University School of Law in Omaha, Neb.

     Shugrue said the debate might go like this: Washington would say
     there's a national interest in controlling pharmaceuticals. States
     would say they have a right to allow prescribing lethal drugs under
     their police powers.

     "It's a classic battle of a state's right to control its destiny
     and the federal government's right to have uniform code of
     conduct," Shugrue said.

     Nena Baker, Jim Barnett, Jeff Mapes and Gail Kinsey Hill of The
     Oregonian staff contributed to this report.

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=8749