X-Message-Number: 9642 Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 06:01:10 -0400 From: Saul Kent <> Subject: Response To Donaldson In (9630), Thomas Donaldson says that "the idea behind cryonics seems to have been lost by those such as Saul." He then goes on to define cryonics, presumably for my benefit and for the benefit of those such as me. I can assure you, Thomas, that I fully understand the idea of cryonics and that I (nor any like me) have lost it. In (9631) Thomas discusses the expectation that cryonics will grow slowly. He concludes his post with the statement that: "...just because a tree grows slowly is no reason to decide it should be cut down." Thomas, what tree are you referring to? Who do you believe has suggested that the tree be "cut down"? And what is the basis for your statement? ---Saul Kent, CEO 21st Century Medicine Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=9642