| Results 91 - 100 of 851 | Search Time 0.008 Seconds |
| Msg | Description |
| # 28264 | Alcor Conference going to be a winner! (Rant on why you should be there!) [RUDIHOFFMA] |
|
back on my relationship with cryonics, extropianism, nanotech,
transhumanism, philosophy, politics, and general "way of (Thu, 27 Jul 2006, 7 KB) |
|
| # 28234 | Stem-cell vs. Nanotech (re: 2020) [Anthony .] |
|
autophagy@gmail.com>
Subject: Stem-cell vs. Nanotech (re: 2020)
In Message #28227 Jordan sparks (Mon, 17 Jul 2006, 3 KB) |
|
| # 28233 | replies to Jordon, Rudi, Steve (Re: 2020 comments) [Anthony .] |
|
a re-write along those lines, but nanotech of
this kind will have such broad (Mon, 17 Jul 2006, 4 KB) |
|
| # 28093 | economics [John de Rivaz] |
|
that impede progress now may well impede nanotech and the
> levelling that it could bring ( (Fri, 23 Jun 2006, 15 KB) |
|
| # 28084 | Re: economics [Anthony .] |
|
We don't have this kind of nanotech and we might not. Indeed, the
problems (Thu, 22 Jun 2006, 4 KB) |
|
| # 28015 | Re: New anti-Cryonics book [Kennita Watson] |
|
been implemented. Oh, and of course all
nanotech research has been stopped in its
tracks.
(Thu, 8 Jun 2006, 2 KB) |
|
| # 27720 | Nanotech helps blind hamsters see [Doug Skrecky] |
|
Doug Skrecky <oberon@vcn.bc.ca>
Subject: Nanotech helps blind hamsters see
[If I can (Thu, 16 Mar 2006, 4 KB) |
|
| # 27656 | The Nanogirl News~ [Gina Miller] |
|
view.php?StoryID=20060220-061417-4185r
Military Nanotech Spending Proves Difficult to Tap. Abstract: U. (Mon, 27 Feb 2006, 15 KB) |
|
| # 27346 | nanotech not needed for revival [Thomas Donaldson] |
|
Thomas Donaldson <73647.1215@compuserve.com>
Subject: nanotech not needed for revival
Hi everyone!
I (Wed, 9 Nov 2005, 2 KB) |
|
| # 27343 | Molecular repair technology is essential [benbest] |
|
may have come-across as too much NanoTech bashing.
I did want to make the (Tue, 8 Nov 2005, 1 KB) |
| CryoNet Home |
Database last updated 17 Mar 2011
|