X-Message-Number: 8386
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 09:50:47 -0700
From: David Brandt-Erichsen <>
Subject: Florida update
(Thursday July 17/97;12:19 p.m. EDT)
FLA. COURT BLOCKS ASSISTED SUICIDE
By Bill Bergstrom
Associated Press Writer
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) -- A man dying of AIDS
may not legally receive a lethal dose of drugs
from his doctor, the state Supreme Court ruled
today.
The justices overturned a lower court ruling
that a privacy provision in Florida's
constitution gave Charles Hall, 35, the right
to physician-assisted suicide.
``It is clear that the public policy of this
state as expressed by the Legislature is
opposed to assisted suicide,'' the justices
ruled.
They reversed a lower court ruling in favor of
Hall, who lives near the Gulf Coast north of
the Tampa Bay area, and Dr. Cecil McIver, who
sought to avoid prosecution if he helped Hall
take his own life.
They had argued that a law against assisted
suicide violated the state Constitution's
privacy clause.
Hall, who has been bedridden at his Beverly
Hills home, could not immediately be reached. A
message on Hall's answering machine said ``If
you're calling about the assisted suicide
issue, we have no comment at this time due to
Charles' deteriorating health.'' It was not
clear whether that was in reference to today's
decision, or just a standing message.
Hall said after oral arguments before the high
court in May he was angry the state had
appealed the ruling giving him the right to a
physician-assisted suicide.
``Why not just let me die in peace? I just
don't understand where the state feels they
have a right to do what they're doing to me,''
he said after listening to attorneys arguments
from a wheelchair.
His attorneys did not immediately return calls
today.
Florida doesn't have a specific law allowing
assisted suicide. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled
in June that Americans do not have a federal
right to have their doctors help them kill
themselves.
Circuit Judge Joseph Davis Jr. had ruled in
West Palm Beach that the privacy provision in
the state Constitution gave competent adults
who were terminally ill that right.
The state high court noted that the U.S.
Supreme Court had declared in its ruling that
there was a ``logical and recognized
distinction between the right to refuse medical
treatment and assisted suicide.''
Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=8386