CryoNet Mailing List Messages 32400 - 32499

  1. #32400 Re: CryoNet #32398 [robomoon] (2329 Bytes)
  2. #32401 "Organization battles to freeze local woman's head" [MARK PLUS] (2246 Bytes)
  3. #32402 Re: uppity_cryonet_members [Luke Parrish] (1370 Bytes)
  4. #32403 Bad publicity leads to more hostile relatives? [MARK PLUS] (1101 Bytes)
  5. #32404 RE: uppity_cryonet_members [David Stodolsky] (2053 Bytes)
  6. #32405 Re: Bad publicity leads to more hostile relatives? [David Stodolsky] (1393 Bytes)
  7. #32406 LJ's alleged next moves [MARK PLUS] (4219 Bytes)
  8. #32407 PR debacles and how to avoid future ones [Rudi Hoffman] (7682 Bytes)
  9. #32408 Re: CryoNet #32403 [Dave Sill] (884 Bytes)
  10. #32409 Message #32403 [doctor Robert] (1200 Bytes)
  11. #32410 Removing incentive [Keith Henson] (1220 Bytes)
  12. #32411 Re: CryoNet #32404 - #32408 [RAMole] (1842 Bytes)
  13. #32412 Talking point suggestion re: the Robbins case [MARK PLUS] (1051 Bytes)
  14. #32413 Re: PR debacles and how to avoid future ones [David Stodolsky] (7818 Bytes)
  15. #32414 How to protect yourself [david pizer] (3607 Bytes)
  16. #32415 Re: Removing incentive [RAMole] (7572 Bytes)
  17. #32416 Like the Air Force, organ printing "is not science fiction." [MARK PLUS] (7125 Bytes)
  18. #32417 Apology to Alcor Board [Rudi Hoffman] (3182 Bytes)
  19. #32418 Anonymity on Cryonics Plans - Disaster Hazard [Kitty Antonik Wakfer] (4644 Bytes)
  20. #32419 Do we want to be a Movement? [hrhirsch] (432 Bytes)
  21. #32420 Re: Do we want to be a Movement? [Alexei Potapov] (925 Bytes)
  22. #32421 Re: CryoNet #32418 - Kitty Antonik Wakfer's Post [Melody Maxim] (1373 Bytes)
  23. #32422 Re: How to protect yourself [Dennis] (691 Bytes)
  24. #32423 Re: How to protect yourself [David Stodolsky] (4747 Bytes)
  25. #32424 Re: Anonymity on Cryonics Plans - Disaster Hazard [David Stodolsky] (1871 Bytes)
  26. #32425 Re: Do we want to be a Movement? [David Stodolsky] (2194 Bytes)
  27. #32426 "Evidence that Cryonics May Work" on YouTube [benbest] (883 Bytes)
  28. #32427 genistein suppresses cryopreservation-induced damage [oberon] (3701 Bytes)
  29. #32428 no association of saturated fat with cardiovascular disease [oberon] (2341 Bytes)
  30. #32429 1973 article about cryonics [MARK PLUS] (1655 Bytes)
  31. #32430 terasem [Ettinger] (600 Bytes)
  32. #32431 Re: Do we want to be a Movement? [David Stodolsky] (2566 Bytes)
  33. #32432 Continuing Message Suppression with CryoNet's Rating System [Kitty Antonik Wakfer] (5101 Bytes)
  34. #32433 Re: #32421: Re: CryoNet #32418 - Kitty Antonik Wakfer's Post... [Kitty Antonik Wakfer] (4393 Bytes)
  35. #32434 Every cryonics suspension member counts! [david pizer] (1984 Bytes)
  36. #32435 Re: CryoNet #32424 Re: Anonymity on Cryonics Plans - Disaster... [Kitty Antonik Wakfer] (5462 Bytes)
  37. #32436 The real cost of doing Neuros [david pizer] (2131 Bytes)
  38. #32437 Physical and biological aspects of renal vitrification. [oberon] (2086 Bytes)
  39. #32438 Re: Continuing Message Suppression with CryoNet's Rating Syst... [David Stodolsky] (2037 Bytes)
  40. #32439 Re: Anonymity on Cryonics Plans - Disaster Hazard [David Stodolsky] (3573 Bytes)
  41. #32440 Re: Cryonics Anonymity [swb1948] (3105 Bytes)
  42. #32441 Court rules frozen remains of Springs woman should go to Ariz... [MARK PLUS] (1242 Bytes)
  43. #32442 Rating system [Steve Jackson] (1568 Bytes)
  44. #32443 D Stodolsky's Replies to Me [Kitty Antonik Wakfer] (15507 Bytes)
  45. #32444 Re: Rating system [David Stodolsky] (3851 Bytes)
  46. #32445 Re: cryonics terminology [York W. &/or Lois G. Porter] (8843 Bytes)
  47. #32446 Re: D Stodolsky's Replies to Me [David Stodolsky] (1428 Bytes)
  48. #32447 Re: "Evidence that Cryonics May Work" on YouTube [benbest] (1226 Bytes)
  49. #32448 Top Ten Behaviors to Avoid Being the Next Cryonics Legal Case... [Rudi Hoffman] (8512 Bytes)
  50. #32449 Re: cryonics terminology [David Stodolsky] (2999 Bytes)
  51. #32450 skeptic podcast about science based medicine [MARK PLUS] (350 Bytes)
  52. #32451 Re: D Stodolsky's Replies to Me [Kitty Antonik Wakfer] (3214 Bytes)
  53. #32452 Re: Rudi's suggestions [swb1948] (1294 Bytes)
  54. #32453 Re: skeptic podcast about science based medicine [David Stodolsky] (595 Bytes)
  55. #32454 Antifreeze proteins can stop ice melt, new study finds [Jens Rabis] (515 Bytes)
  56. #32455 Re: Rudi's suggestions [flavonoid] (844 Bytes)
  57. #32456 Re: CryoNet #32448 - Rudi's 'Top Ten' [Kitty Antonik Wakfer] (4792 Bytes)
  58. #32457 Some cryonicists just don't underestand. [david pizer] (5217 Bytes)
  59. #32458 Re: neuro vs whole [rr ss] (589 Bytes)
  60. #32459 Re: neuro vs whole [Mathew Sullivan] (2104 Bytes)
  61. #32460 Re: Cash funding for cryonics [Rudi Hoffman] (2723 Bytes)
  62. #32461 Cost of Neuro vs. Whole Body Cryopreservation [Melody Maxim] (1477 Bytes)
  63. #32462 Re: CryoNet #32457 - #32460 [David Stodolsky] (3481 Bytes)
  64. #32463 No Subject [david pizer] (1558 Bytes)
  65. #32464 Re: CryoNet #32457 - #32460 [Michael Smith] (1142 Bytes)
  66. #32465 No Subject [david pizer] (3803 Bytes)
  67. #32466 Re: CryoNet #32460 - Rudi's Statements about Variable Annuiti... [Kitty Antonik Wakfer] (7780 Bytes)
  68. #32467 Re: CryoNet #32457 - #32460 [John Clark] (507 Bytes)
  69. #32468 Re: CryoNet #32457 - #32460 [John Clark] (1218 Bytes)
  70. #32469 Re: Some cryonicists just don't underestand. [david pizer] [Mike Perry] (10458 Bytes)
  71. #32470 I stand corrected [Rudi Hoffman] (729 Bytes)
  72. #32471 Re: Some cryonicists just don't underestand. [david pizer] [David Stodolsky] (1265 Bytes)
  73. #32472 Re: #32465: No Subject [Mathew Sullivan] (1503 Bytes)
  74. #32473 Re: Some cryonicists just don't underestand. [david pizer] [Jordan Sparks] (1164 Bytes)
  75. #32474 Florida Today carried an impartial review of cryonics and The... [John Bull] (337 Bytes)
  76. #32475 Alternate forms of cryonics [Luke Parrish] (2910 Bytes)
  77. #32476 Re: CryoNet #32470: I stand corrected [Rudi Hoffman] [Kitty Antonik Wakfer] (970 Bytes)
  78. #32477 Message Ratings (Still) being Abused [Kitty Antonik Wakfer] (3732 Bytes)
  79. #32478 Censorship Allowed by Cryonet Rating System [Melody Maxim] (1316 Bytes)
  80. #32479 Cryonics debate on Cult Education Forum [MARK PLUS] (291 Bytes)
  81. #32480 Fw: [universalimmortalism] Alcor-lovers vs. Neuro-lovers [david pizer] (5493 Bytes)
  82. #32481 Collateral Damage or Misguided Malarkey? [Kevin Q. Brown] (2641 Bytes)
  83. #32482 Re: CryoNet #32479 - #32481 [Luke Parrish] (3012 Bytes)
  84. #32483 Re: Collateral Damage or Misguided Malarkey? [David Stodolsky] (3068 Bytes)
  85. #32484 Re: CryoNet #32479 - #32481 [David Stodolsky] (1652 Bytes)
  86. #32485 Re: Collateral Damage or Misguided Malarkey? [Luke Parrish] (584 Bytes)
  87. #32486 Re: CryoNet #32483 Collateral Damage or Misguided Malarkey [Kitty Antonik Wakfer] (8173 Bytes)
  88. #32487 Fw: Hydrogen Sulfide [JOSEPH W MORGAN] (457 Bytes)
  89. #32488 Re: Collateral Damage or Misguided Malarkey? [David Stodolsky] (1348 Bytes)
  90. #32489 CryoNet Reboot [Kevin Q. Brown] (1287 Bytes)
  91. #32490 Medieval child's brain to unlock human thought processes [MARK PLUS] (485 Bytes)
  92. #32491 Re: Alcor-lovers vs. Neuro-lovers [Mike Perry] (1466 Bytes)
  93. #32492 Cryonics Technology Progress Conf Agenda - April 9th - 11th, ... [Ilir Dema] (750 Bytes)
  94. #32493 Re: Alcor-lovers vs. Neuro-lovers [David Stodolsky] (1291 Bytes)
  95. #32494 New Technique Turns Proteins Into Glass [oberon] (8501 Bytes)
  96. #32495 AW: CryoNet #32492 - #32494 [Jens Rabis] (2732 Bytes)
  97. #32496 Re: Alcor-lovers vs. Neuro-lovers [Dennis] (1725 Bytes)
  98. #32497 Translation of German glassy protein paper [RAMole] (5634 Bytes)
  99. #32498 on the "delicate and fleeting nature" of synapses [Jeff Davis] (600 Bytes)
  100. #32499 Re: Alcor-lovers vs. Neuro-lovers [Mike Perry] (682 Bytes)